• A white robed young woman glides stealthily, ghost-like, down the stairs of the Chelsea Hotel, the walls a muted white behind her, as the eerie music begins.  As the pace of the dance accelerates, the woman begins moving up and down the stairs dangerously, recklessly.  Suddenly, she flings herself backward wildly, self-destructively, upon the filigreed railing, leaning out over the void, her head tilted down almost vertically.  A tragic beauty, distraught, ready to sacrifice all!

    It was only later that choreographer Merle Lister heard the legend of the restless spirit who roams the history-haunted halls of the Chelsea in a long white dress.

    This innovative work, titled Dance of the Spirits, was created in 1983 to commemorate the 100th Anniversary of the 1883 founding of the Chelsea.  Merle remembers that Stanley had palm trees set up in Merledance the lobby for the occasion, as well as a stage where residents sang and entertained.  Arthur Miller turned out for the occasion, which was hosted by a Irish theater troupe, and a singer named Sandy Toder Dancer  performed.  And upstairs on the 7th floor, as part of the festivities, the audience members standing, Merle, a pioneer in site-specific performance, “staged” her groundbreaking dance.

    The woman in white, in a strong performance, was portrayed by Gina Lior, while the haunting score was composed by Alan Cohen, who also danced.  Other dancers included Genevieve Matin, and the young Merle Herself.  Camera work was provided by Eric Wolfe.  And Merle’s husband, renowned lighting designer Leonard Levine, who sadly passed away a few years back, and whom we all remember fondly, applied his usual visual magic to the lighting.

    As a child, Merle Lister was captivated by the National Ballet of Canada, and as a result started choreographing early.  By the time she was 14 she had already decided to move to New York—though her parents didn’t get on board with this.  As it turned out, however, Merle didn’t wait long, arriving in the city in 1962 at the ripe old age of 23.  Merle studied briefly at the Martha Graham School, but soon found that that was not her style.  She then gravitated to the avant garde, and began working with the Living Theater.

    Though influenced by the work of Jerry Grotowski, whose techniques changed the whole concept of theater, melding, as they did, movement and voice into a total concept, Merle never subscribed to any particular school of dance.  Becoming involved in Improv, she sought to use her choreography to assemble the disparate aspects of the dance holistically.  In the 60s she worked with Ellen Stewart at La Mama, teaching in the Plexis Troupe, and later collaborated with such figures as Lynn Loredo and Joe Chaikin, as well as with Joel Schick on his Coffee House Chronicles.

                In the 70s Merle founded the Merle Lister Dance Company, which performed at Lincoln Center, in Central Park, and at the 92nd Street Y.  She also ran her own school, Creative Movement, out of a large loft in Chelsea.  And, in a bit of Chelsea Hotel trivia, Merle was friends with Viva, the Warhol superstar, when they both lived at the hotel, and helped her daughter, Gaby Hoffman, rehearse for her role in the popular movie Field of Dreams.

                  Back in the wild and wooly days of 1983, a desperate junkie might steal whatever he could get his hands on, or a deranged vandal might go on an iconoclastic slashing spree so there was no art displayed on the stairwell walls.  It was against this background, both of the ghostly white walls, and of the air of freedom mixed with desperation, of lost souls passing through the Chelsea, that Merle’s composition is set.  As Gina Lior thrashes against the railing, a wraith-like Alan Cohen appears, slithering up the stairs: a serpentine elemental spirit, come to snatch the distracted woman in white down to hell?  But no, he glides right past her, each dancer in his or her own appointed reality, like us all, partaking of their own individualized reality among the infinite choices possible in the seductive yet damning shadow realm of the Chelsea.  A youthful Merle emerges from the east wing of the hotel in flowing blue gown and ghoulish make-up, as spooky voices swell in the background: Queen of the Damned?  Or simply the spirit of a frustrated artist or actress, who, unfulfilled, prowls the lonely halls looking for that lost talent or promise she left behind?

    The dancers used the available space well, filling all areas: rail, stairs, bare wall, and then swinging doors, spacious halls, window well.  The dancers glided by one another, more intimately connected with the surroundings than with one another, spirits who had become, over years and decades of solitary wandering, a part of the hotel themselves, rather than living humans relating to each other.  The viewer was transported back in time to an earlier—though timeless–period in the hotel’s history, overwhelmed with a sad and nostalgic poignancy, as the music provided the appropriate atmospheric accompaniment.

    The video that I saw was of a dress rehearsal that took place on the 7th floor.  For the actual performance, the audience members stood by the elevator and watched the action, but for the rehearsal only the cast and crew were present.  At one point during the dance, however, providing a moment of levity, a young boy with long, dark hair steps off the elevator and gets into the picture. But his appearance, while it somehow reinforced the transience and impermanence that was a theme of the dance, also suggested the lasting influence that the art created at the Chelsea, and the lives lived here in pursuit of that work, can have on generations yet to come. — Ed Hamilton

    {Merle is looking for somebody to transfer the video of this remarkable dance to a CD.}

  • Susan and I went to a party the other night hosted by a fellow blogger named Trevor whom we met online and then started running into around the neighborhood.  It was already crowded when we got there.  Trevor, the host, told us that one of his friends was visiting from out of town, and he had sent him to the Chelsea Hotel.
         “But I’m not sure if he likes it,” Trevor said.  “He doesn’t know anything about the Chelsea or its history, and he’s just used to staying in regular hotels.”
          We ran into Trevor’s friend, Bob, a tall, muscular man in his thirties, later in the evening.  “Trevor tells me you’re staying at the Chelsea,” I said.  “How do you like it?”

    “Man, that place is a dump.  I can’t believe Trevor sent me there, but I know he thinks it’s a joke.”

    I told him you had to really be into the whole Bohemian trip to appreciate it.  “How much are they hitting you up for?” I asked.

    “$260 a night!” Bob said.  “I know it’s New York and all, but I’m getting raped, aren’t I.  When they took me up to my room I just rolled my eyes.  I couldn’t believe it.  It was a crack den.  I started looking around for needles and used condoms and stuff on the floor.”

    Susan and I both cracked up at this.

    “But that’s OK, I can take it for a couple of nights,” Bob said.  “Let Trevor have his fun.”  He went on to say, however, that another friend of his claimed to have seen a special on HBO that said the Chelsea was haunted.  “He’s not telling the truth, is he?”

    “Well, a lot of people think it is,” Susan said.  We then went on to tell him about Sid’s ghost, Thomas Wolfe’s ghost, the Betty Boop ghost, Larry the hipster ghost, and the various other famous spectral manifestations of the hotel.

    “How do you people know so much about this?” Bob asked suspiciously.

    We explained that we had lived in the Chelsea for 13 years.  And since he seemed interested, I also took the opportunity to mention that he could pick up a copy of Legends at the Barnes and Noble, or at any other fine bookstore near him.  Some times we had to shout over the din of the music and conversation, but Bob definitely got the gist of it.

    “Shit,” he said.  “$260 a night to sleep with a ghost!”  He told us about how when he was a kid he had moved with his parents into a big old house where he heard mysterious noises that he attributed to ghosts.  “They made the heating ducts creak, and opened doors when no one was standing there.”

    I guess it was at about this time that it occurred to both Susan and I that this guy was really, seriously afraid of ghosts—though certainly the realization had been building all along.  Maybe we should have tried to reassure him, but we couldn’t help ourselves: it was too much fun to string him along.

    “What floor are you on?” Susan asked.

    “Why, does that matter?” Bob asked in turn.

    “Some floors are more notorious for psychic activity,” I said.

    “Uh, the first floor,” Bob said warily.

    “Oh no!” both Susan and I exclaimed.  “That’s Sid’s floor!”

    “Oh my God,” Bob said.  “I knew there was something wrong with that floor.  There’s that painting of that scary lady who looks like she’s looking at you, right when you get off the elevator.”  (It’s by Hawk Alfredson.)  “I should have turned right around and walked back out as soon as I saw that.  I’m not scared of anything—any man.  I train fighters for Bodog fighting.  But you can’t fight a ghost.  A ghost is not rational.  He’s not gonna spin me around or anything is he?”

    “Nah, I doubt it,” I said.  “Sid usually just stops the elevator and gets on or off.  Of course he’s got a bad reputation because of that dustup with Nancy, but I’ve never heard of him bothering anybody.  Stanley says he was a nice, polite young man.”

    Bob was far from reassured.  Later that night, as were waiting for the elevator to leave, we heard him out in the hallway taking to his girlfriend—or rather yelling at her—over his cell phone: “There’s this guy here who WROTE A BOOK ABOUT THE HOTEL, and he says it’s haunted!  I’m gonna kill Trevor!  He screwed me!  I’m gonna check out and send him the bill!”

    Bob had made the mistake of telling us his room number, and so when we got back to the hotel we left a note under his door:

    Love Kills – Sid V.

    But that’s not all.  When we got up to the first floor and started to go through the glass door into Sid’s wing to deliver our note, there was a drunk guy up on the second floor hanging over the railing and when he saw us he started raving, “Don’t go in there!  I’m scared of that floor!  I know what happened down there!  You couldn’t pay me to get off on that floor!”  These things tend to cluster, I suppose.  Or maybe there was a full moon that night.  We heard the drunk guy stalking around on one of the floors above as we got on the elevator to ride up to our floor, and wondered if he’d still be around when Bob got back to the hotel. — Ed Hamilton

        

  • Most Chelsea Hotel residents know not to spend extended time in the basement.  The rest of the Hotel is filled with enough ghosts so we don’t need to tempt fate by venturing into the bottom of the vortex.  Heather Graham appears to not to have got the word.  This is the result! I guess she’ll be moving in soon for an extended stay. Surely BD can find a room for an international star such as this.
    Basement

  • Once again, the LA Superior Court is set to rule on whether or not Hotel Chelsea layabout David Elder is Davidelder_2 fit to serve as the administrator of a trust established for aging author Piri Thomas.  When David’s mother died in 1986, she left her 16% interest in the Chelsea Hotel to David and his two siblings in trust.  However, the trust stipulated that Piri Thomas, her husband and David’s stepfather, was to receive all income from the trust for as long as he lived. 
         David and his siblings didn’t care for that arrangement and have refused to hand over the 1.2 million that the trust has generated in income, forcing Piri to sue for the money.  Though the court called David and his siblings’ argument that the income was principal “absurd,” and ruled against them, they have tied it up in appeals for years.

    According to the website, the case will be heard on 2/25/2008 at 1:30 p.m in Department 11 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA.

  • On Goldie’s first trip to NYC in June 1986, he stayed at the Chelsea Hotel with Birdie and manager Martin Jones. As dawn breaks, he rants at imaginary people from his bedroom window. Clip from Zulu Dawn, a documentary on the pioneer UK hip hoppers of the 80s, that catches up with their lives today.

    Goldie

  • Miceflee_2

    It seems that filmmaker Steve Marcus was shooting outside of the Hotel back in June 2007 and captured some live action that went down after the mice got the word that the Bards were out.  The rodent in this film is not as fortunate as the rodent in "Legends" who is thrown from the balcony of the Chelsea and ends up in some woman’s beehive.
    The
    Three Thug Mice (http://www.threethugmice.com/) is a series of 35 animated short online films set in the grimy underbelly of the concrete jungle.  The Three Thug Mice are the brainchild of New York City artist, Steve Marcus (http://www.smarcus.com/). 

  • Arguments were heard Friday (2/15/08) in Landlord Larry Tauber’s appellate court case against tenant Daniel Peckham.  Tauber’s lawyer came out first thing and started bitching about how her client had to Peckhamclose_2 hold up his construction plans just because of this one tenant, but the judges quickly silenced her, directing her to focus on the issue at hand.  What the case was really about was whether or not gut renovation (at Peckham’s building, and in general, since the case may set a precedent), which tenant activists characterize as “phony demolition” fits the DHCR’s standards for permissible demolition.  (Gut renovation has become popular of late as a way for landlords to try to get rid of rent-stabilized tenants) The DHCR had decided that it did, and then the State Supreme Court had ruled that the DHCR needed to revisit that decision, and in the present case Tauber was arguing that the original determination should hold.

                Tauber’s lawyer argued that the DHCR had a clear standard in place stating that demolition did not have to involve taking down the exterior walls of a building, that if you could stand in the basement and look up at the sky that constituted demolition under the DHCR rules.  Judges asked if it was not permissible for the DHCR to revise it’s standards, perhaps in response to the overheated real estate situation, and Tauber’s lawyer said it wasn’t fair to do so midstream in Tauber’s project.

                Both Peckham’s lawyer, Stewart W. Lawrence, and the DHCR lawyer argued that the DHCR should get the case back so that they could clarify their standard as to whether or not gut-renovation constituted actual demolition.  Judges pointed out that the DHCR seemed to have been comfortable with the “stand-in-the-basement-and-look-at-the-sky” standard, and asked whether or not this seeming change of heart on the part of the DHCR had anything to do with the recent gubernatorial election, in which the democrat Eliot Spitzer replaced the outgoing republican Pataki.  The DHCR lawyer said no, but that they now intended to be more proactive in articulating their standards in this and other issues.

                It was difficult to tell which way the case will go.  Although the Judges didn’t seem to think it was necessarily too late for the DHCR to change its standard in Tauber’s case, one of them saying that, actually, the decision was still ongoing as it worked its way through the courts, they seemed to bristle at the suggestion that political ideology might be influencing the DHCR to revisit cases that had already been decided.  But one of the judges asked why the DHCR couldn’t just use the cases before it presently to articulate its standard as to what constitutes demolition, which seems to suggest that even if Tauber wins this case it won’t necessarily constitute a precedent for future gut-renovations.

    At one point one of the judges briefly brought up the subsidiary issue of Tauber’s financial fitness to complete the renovations of the building.  Though his lawyer assured the judge that Tauber had satisfied the requirements, Tauber has been losing hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in rents simply because he refuses to settle with Peckham.  The decision in this case will take two to five months to complete, during which time Tauber will lose even more money, and perhaps by that point his financial situation really will become relevant. — Ed Hamilton

  • G.R. N’Namdi Gallery is pleased to announce the Opening Reception for Herbert Gentry’s retrospective exhibition, entitled “The Man, The Master, The Magic” celebrating over forty years of work on February 15th, 2008 from 6 until 10 pm.  This retrospective exhibition runs from February 15th – April 12th, 2008. The Hgmmm opening reception is sponsored by Uptown Magazine and Martell. The Gallery is located at 526 West 26th Street, #316.

    "The paintings and drawings in this retrospective exhibition vary in size and range from 1964 until 2003.
    Gentry’s formation as a painter should be considered in light of the passion he brought to his identity as a painter, “A painter paints, a fighter fights, a writer writes,” he would say. Gentry painted his world on canvas, alluding to his fascination with the power of social relationships and the allure of the journey. His aesthetic speaks through decisive lines and a strong sense of composition.  His canvasses are intuitively descriptive of his international experiences living in Harlem and throughout Europe. He stated: “Painting is very much about sex, it’s about love, it’s about putting things together”.  The drawings featured in this exhibition, although as extemporaneous as his paintings, are more laid-back and lovely. They’re filled with sinfully sinuous lines forming erotic shapes inspired by the curvaceous form of the female body." (From the Press Release) 

    man-laï and the Catalan Institute of America invite everyone to a book presentation and reception: XAVIER Xavier CARBONELL "fragments". Painter Xavier Carbonell will be attending the reception and signing books. “fragments” has been published in celebration of this exhibition of new work by the artist. Copies of the book will be available free of charge on a first come first serve basis.  Friday, Feb. 15, 7:00 – 9:00 p.m.
    JADITE Galleries, 413 West 50th Street, NY NY

    The Pavel Zoubok Gallery at 533 West 23rd Street in New York is hosting a May Wilson Woowoo_2 retrospective exhibition from February 15 – March 15, 2008 (opening reception on February 15, from 6 to 8 pm). It was under May Wilson’s bed (After a stint living in the Chelsea Hotel, May moved into the building next door) that Valerie Solanas stored the gun she used to shoot Andy Warhol.

    During the 1960s Wilson’s work was included in Martha Jackson’s "New Media New Forms: In Painting and Sculpture" exhibition which featured the works of artists that were often referred to as "Neo-Dada" or "New Realists" before the term "Pop Art" was adopted in the United States.

    Wilson was also the subject of the excellent 1969 documentary, Woo Who? May Wilson, from which the current exhibition takes its name.

    The exhibition at Pavel Zoubok is running in collaboration with the May Wilson exhibition at the Morris Museum in New Jersey.

  • The ceiling in artist Michele Zalopany’s Chelsea Hotel apartment/studio has a leak—or rather Mzwaterfall_2 several leaks.  There’s a two-foot hole in her living room ceiling where the water pours through–buckets when it rains.  Michele had to climb up on a ladder herself and remove the cracked and drooping plaster so it wouldn’t fall on somebody’s head.  She lately had to move her heavy couch from under the hole as well, to keep it from being soaked through.  On the other side of the living room there’s another large leak where water has seeped in through the ceiling and run down the wall, peeling the paint and bubbling up the plaster, which looks as if it could start falling anytime now.  And in the bathroom there’s yet another enormous leak where water streams in.
             Michele, a successful artist who also teaches at Harvard, says she approached the hotel’s Director of Operations Glennon Travis in August of 07—when she returned from a trip abroad–and he assured her that he’d take steps to rectify the soggy situation.  In her only contact with Glennon since Mzceil2 then, Michele says that she found him to be, “unapproachable, inaccessible, and hostile,” when she wanted to discuss an unrelated matter. 

    Meanwhile, the walls in Michele’s apartment—especially the one in the bathroom–have sprouted white mold, and Michele is developing respiratory problems.  She says she has itchy eyes, and sometimes has difficulty breathing, which makes it hard to sleep at night.

    In my work for Chelsea Now, I visited several SROs in the Chelsea area where the landlord had purposely punched holes in the roof to introduce leaks into the building (a common tactic used to empty a building of rent stabilized tenants) and the leakage in Michele’s apartment was comparable to some of the worst I have seen.  Although there’s no indication here that the leakage was purposely caused, Michele says that when Stanley was in charge he could be counted on to send up the painter and the plasterer every few months to fix up the holes.
             Now, however, because the situation has been allowed to deteriorate for the past seven months, Mzmold spot repairs probably won’t do the trick anymore.  (Michele knows of at least one other person on her floor who is enduring a similar situation.)  The bottom line is, the roof needs to be repaired.  And although this may present some problems because of the roof garden directly above Michele’s apartment, it simply has to be done, as every tenant in New York City is entitled to a warm, dry apartment that doesn’t make him or her sick.  “Marlene Krauss spoke about all the improvements that the new management is doing,” Michele pointed out, “and then when it comes down to the facts, they aren’t doing jack.”

    Mzmold2

  • Here are a couple of recent e-mails from our readers/hotel guests.  Reader number one seems to be having trouble getting a straight answer about the room rates, while Reader # 2 as to whether to come to the hotel at all. 

    "On Monday, the rate was $189 for a Saturday night stay in a room with a king size bed and a bathroom. By Wednesday, it had risen to $225.  Each time I call, I say "may I speak to Stanley Bard?" The first time, the reaction was snotty. The second time, the guy said "I haven’t seen him in months. Wish I had." 

    "Anyway, I’ve stayed at the Hotel twice during the Stanley days and now have an opportunity to bring a younger friend (who would absolutely plotz if she got to stay there), along the next time I’m in NYC, probably April.  In your opinion, do we stay there, putting money into the pockets of the proverbial enemy, or not stay there out of protest for what is being done to it, thereby providing them less business, and thereby encouraging further outrage to the premises?  I feel somewhat damned either way."

    Well reader #2 we think that you should definitely still visit us.  Despite the absence of Stanley and the obnoxious corporate presence this is still a really cool place to pass through.  We’re not trying to bankrupt the hotel, just get rid of BD (in fact, we think that it’s BD that is trying to bankrupt the hotel so they can buy it cheap.) but when you do visit make your displeasure known in some way. You could wear a protest shirt reading “Bring Back the Bards” or something similar. And be sure to do what reader #1 suggests and ask for Stanley Bard.  That drives them nuts.