I am writing in support of Stanley and David Bard whose management of the Hotel Chelsea has made it a Swanwolfe3 famous New York institution known the world over. The last time I stayed there, I was interviewed in the lobby by a French journalist about the Chelsea’s contribution to the city’s cultural fabric. The journalist did her story because her paper admired the Chelsea and wanted to tell its story to her readers. Indeed, the Chelsea’s story needs to be told and retold, not just to French readers, but to Americans who don’t know about Stanley Bard’s heroic and largely unsung contribution to the arts in North America. He and his father before him respected the arts and ran their hotel so musicians, actors, artists and writers like myself could stay at a reasonable rate and create on its premises, and the list of work composed, drawn or written at the Chelsea is in many ways a portrait of North America’s arts in the twentieth century.

Forcing Stanley and his son David out of the Hotel Chelsea is a sad day for the arts in New York and the rest of the world too. It is also a dumb business decision, sincerely, Susan Swan (Toronto novelist)
(Photo: Susan and Thomas Wolfe having a chat!)

Posted in

3 responses to “Novelist Susan Swan Weighs In: A Sad Day for Arts”

  1. Cowboy Avatar
    Cowboy

    Beautiful sentiment.

    Like

  2. sparkle Avatar
    sparkle

    She’s right, and the first person I can recall to mention this: It’s a dumb business decision. The New Order will lose a lot of the old customers, along with the new ones who have wanted to stay in the Chelsea for years, were planning to in many cases, but don’t want to now. Can they replace them with new customers who want to pay high hotel rates for a controversial boutique hotel in a city that is now overloaded with boutique hotels? The only way they can make money off the Chelsea now, is by turning it into Condos, and I don’t think that can happen since Stanley is majority stockholder, though with no power over the management of the hotel now thanks to what appear to be shark-like legal maneuvers that robbed him of his birthright. If I’m wrong, and they can turn it into Condos without Stanley’s permission, will someone let me know?

    Like

  3. tk Avatar
    tk

    Yes, but even if it was a good “business decision” it would be a bad decision. Some things are more important than money, but not to these partners who weaselled Stanley out. How they threw him out, in such a nasty way, despite the fact that he’s the majority shareholder and has run the place for a half century, says everything about these people. A part of me feels sorry for them, that they seem incapable of appreciating what the Chelsea was before they started interfering. If a place like Stanley’s Chelsea hotel doesn’t exist in this world, this world is crap and we are all slaves to the money men.

    Like

Leave a comment