Sherill Tippins Op/Ed piece in today’s NY Times reminds us that when the Chelsea was built New Yorkers were facing a similar housing crisis.  She writes, "The Chelsea was built to address this problem.  A French-born writer, inventor, architect, and idealist, Philip Gengembre Hubert, introduced the cooperative apartment system to New York, specifically to free New Yorkers from the burden of overpriced housing and to encourage the cross-class intermingling neded to nurture a cohesive culture."  Tippins also mentions how readers of this blog have responded with creative solutions as to how to deal with the recent hostile take over of the Chelsea.  Here’s one of the more interesting.

Surely, if the Soho artists could get an entire neighborhood zoned just for artists, the Chelsea, with its landmarked status, could work with foundations, friendly investors, Before artists-with-money, the Bards, and residents to create a zoned hotel for the arts.

First, all current residents would be grandfathered in. No one would feel any pressure to leave.

Second, the transient hotel sector would remain, since it’s part of what keeps the Chelsea lively and at the forefront of public consciousness.

As for the residents: how about regulating a mix of 10% of residents unrestricted (any income level, any occupation); 60% artists; 30% middle and low income? The Chelsea Corporation could be run by an elected Board of Directors with the same percentages, and with Stanley as permanent appointee.

Maybe Ethan Hawke has a lawyer on retainer, or maybe there’s a lawyer-artist in the building (I think there is) who would find it interesting to look into that possibility, or a variation of it. And it does sound like something Bloomberg might find it useful to back, doesn’t it?

Frankly, it seems to me an improvement on the top-down system of a corporate-owned hotel anyway. The Chelsea was built as one of the city’s first co-ops. Maybe it’s time for it to return to its origins.

If anyone has more ideas please add them to the mix. Yesterday, a reader from Canada posted another idea on his blog.

Posted in

6 responses to “A Zoned Hotel for the Arts?”

  1. lp Avatar
    lp

    I don’t know that I want a board comprised of me and my neighbors. It creates power politics among the residents. Don’t go there. Seriously. I think people relate better without those residential politics, and the artists should be working on their art, not sitting around trying to decide the fate of other tenants. Let’s just get the Bards back, and running the place again. They did a very good job under complicated and sometimes weird circumstances. So, If we’re going to find some way(s) to buy back the building, can we make plan number one to do it with the Bards running it the way they always ran it? Bringing politics into it makes me very nervous.

    Like

  2. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    I’m a reporter for the Chelsea Clinton News, and I’m currently working on a story about the Hotel Chelsea and it’s new management. I would particularly like to speak to some of the people who live in the hotel to get their thoughts on the matter; however, since I can’t go up and down the hallways of the hotel banging on doors, I thought this would be a good place to direct my search.
    If you live in the hotel, or know someone who does, please contact me at your earliest conveniance at cderespina@manhattanmedia.com
    Thanks,
    Cody

    Like

  3. Natalie Avatar
    Natalie

    While visiting NYC and staying at the Chelsea this weekend, I met Ed Hamilton and Debbie Martin, two of my newfound heros. I’m a fundraiser in Cincinnati for an art museum, which is also an historic home. The idea of raising funds to support the ability for artists to live in the hotel is completely reasonable…in fact, it would be an interesting sell to funders nationwide…AND would provide new opportunities for the artists living there to showcase their work at least annually – afterall, funders want to see that their support is contributing to the community.
    I wonder what the options are for Stanley, as controlling partner, to bequeath the building to the artists of NYC as a co-op in his will (not that I’m wishing Stanley ill health!). That’s what the owners of my museum did with their art collections and home 75 years ago – now it’s still a functioning museum…

    Like

  4. Carrie Bedsore /Cherry Ramone / Rob from Aus Avatar
    Carrie Bedsore /Cherry Ramone / Rob from Aus

    Anarchist imaginings of a new beginning are the way to go.
    I agree with ‘lp’ on the danger inherent in neighbours becoming fellow board members but this general idea is brilliant. Especially glad that the ‘transients’ aren’t forgotten [can’t we be visitors? ‘transients’ sounds so… derelict]. I hope that we regular transients contribute something above helping control rent for the residents, not to say I mind paying exorbidant costs when I know the artists are being looked after.

    Like

  5. chelsearez Avatar
    chelsearez

    I don’t think we should mess too much with Stanley’s winning formula. After all, isn’t that what the New Order wants to do? Give me the Bards very benevolent despotism over co-ops and tenant boardsa.

    Like

  6. Hotel California Avatar

    Hotel California

    Hotel California Barcelona, accommodation finder for hotels in Barcelona. It\’ Posit

    Like

Leave a comment