All of the residents of the Hotel received a letter in their boxes late last week. Though it sounds like they
just want to clean out the trash, the halls of the Chelsea have always had a more casual, lived-in feel to them. Some residents have turned the space outside their doors into pleasant little sitting rooms or galleries. Though we never let the place get so cluttered that people were tripping over things, Stanley was always tolerant of this kind of individual expressions. Furthermore, as many residents have enjoyed this privilege for years and even decades, they may well have legal standing to challenge BD’s Draconian edict. (Also, where’s the old stationary, this is the pits!)
In addition, work is now being done on the historic “Hotel Chelsea” neon sign that adorns the façade of the building. The workers have been not only cleaning, but also painting parts of the sign, (as you can see, they only painted the “Hot” on this side.) apparently with the goal of making it more reflective, so that the neon will shine brighter at night. I spoke with a resident involved in the restoration of the building, and
he argued that they were cleaning up and restoring the building to its original grandeur, and that, as opposed to Stanley’s policy of benevolent neglect, this new direction actually shows more respect for the building.
There is much to be said for this view and there is a part of me too that would like to see the place restored. On the other hand, however, it seems that the darkness and grit of the Chelsea is a large part of its charm. Sure, if something is falling apart it needs to be fixed – Stanley always recognized that. But what era is the Chelsea famous for? Surely not the 19th Century when it was a luxury apartment building. No more like the 50s of the Beats, the 60s of Warhol, and the 70s of the punks. “It looked like a flophouse before,” said my fellow resident. But in a sense, it was. That’s how all these artists could afford to live here. The Chelsea is the most famous flophouse in the world.
“You could hardly see the sign before,” my fellow resident said. But 23rd Street is not Times Square, nor – a certain giant pink cupcake notwithstanding – Disneyland. You could always see it well enough in its dark understated glory.
And besides all that, if this “beautification” campaign takes hold, sooner or later they are going to want some prettier, and richer, people to match the surroundings. — Ed Hamilton
Living with Legends
Hotel Chelsea Blog
7 responses to “Hotel Chelsea Beautification Campaign Kicksoff!”
-
They may have respect for the physical building, but as we’ve seen over and over again, they have no respect or understanding of the residents or the spirit of the hotel or of what the Bards contributed.
LikeLike
-
The Chelsea was never a flophouse in my memory. A little gritty, but let’s not exaggerate.
LikeLike
-
I liked the Chelsea’s gritty edge. It was part of its authenticity, its yin and yang. I liked the sign the way it was too. I liked that many of the resident rooms were blank canvases when one moved in, and we were allowed to do with them what we wanted. I liked the old fixtures and moldings and tiles and lamps. What they are doing now is not renovating but Disneyfying,
LikeLike
-
it’s so sad. they think they are improving the hotel when infact they are destroying it. so blind
LikeLike
-
Pray tell, please do a post about what they are doing with all the artwork in the Hotel?
LikeLike
-
I think that just painting HOT was intentional. Get it HOTel? So cool!
LikeLike
-
Whay 25 year old suit decided to do to clean up! I haven’t lived in NYC for a while, but certain places need to be left as they are because of atmosphere. You can ruin the Chelsea ambiance in a matter of days.
Certain things are fragile!
CCWLikeLike
Leave a comment