I have lived in Chelsea for the past 11 years and have always wondered about the situation in the Chelsea Hotel. Do they still allow people to live there or is it as overpriced as everywhere else in the city. My friend used to work in the the 303 hair salon and I went to visit to see and explore this place because being an artist myself I have held the Chelsea in such high regard for what it apparently represents. It wasn’t the best experience actually Stanley Bard told me to get out and that I wasn’t allowed to look around, but that is besides the point. I could never afford to get a room there so I never stayed.  Chelsea as is NYC is becoming almost impossible to live in, we are actually moving soon.

Anyhow I guess I just wanted to see if people are still allowed to live there full time and if artists are welcome and what was it like in the past. I saw a wonderful documentary on it with Quintin Crisp and Jobriath with his pyramid apartment (is it still there?). Judging by your blog it might as well be the Maritime Hotel, but I figured I would ask anyhow.  Best

Well, it’s not as bad as the Maritime yet, thank God, though it does seem to be moving swiftly in that direction. We’re working as hard as we can here at Legends to forestall that trend. In answer to your question, there are still a large number of permanent residents living at the Chelsea, but the sad thing is that the new management company, BD, is not allowing any new comers to become permanent. It’s a damn shame for a number of reasons. For one thing it alters the edgy vibe of the hotel, which has always been a mix of old Bohemians and energetic new blood. But by far the most regrettable consequence is that it destroys the beautiful dream of the Chelsea, which is the dream of New York itself: no longer can a young artist with little money move in and work to achieve a name for himself in his chosen field. New York (and now the Chelsea) to young artists: Drop Dead.

We’re sorry NYC is losing you: All the wrong people are moving out. The pyramid is still on the roof, though Jobriath died of AIDS. The hair salon, April Barton’s Suite 303, is still here, though will probably have to leave when its lease is up. Sorry about Stanley too: he’s very protective of the hotel and perhaps it was just a bad day. On a better day, he might have proudly shown you around the place himself. — Ed Hamilton

Posted in

3 responses to “A Concerned Reader Writes:”

  1. Mep Avatar
    Mep

    New York is still a place where artists can come and live, just not most of Manhattan.
    But people want to be able to say they live in Manhattan and sound cool to their friends and family back home, so they have no interest in living in Queens or other affordable spots.

    Like

  2. Witness Avatar
    Witness

    There’s also something to be said for experiencing the extra-close proximity in Manhattan of so many different types of creatives souls, though. Even Brooklyn and Queens, part of the city that they are, are a little more spread out and a little less diverse in terms of the creative community. (Think of Williamsburg.) Seems to me that the other boroughs work best after one has soaked up Manhattan for a few years at least–and that’s what’s becoming nearly impossible now.
    How long will Brooklyn, Queens, etc., continue to attract artists if Manhattan loses its even stronger magnetic power?

    Like

  3. LP Avatar
    LP

    Even Brooklyn and Queens are getting too expensive for most artists. If you’re a sculptor, jujst as an example, and need space to work, you’d better be successful already or have a trust fund. A lot of artists I know have gone to newark.

    Like

Leave a comment