Legends has managed to obtain a copy of the arbitration filing that will ultimately determine who will manage the Chelsea Hotel.  What happened in this case is that BD filed suit against the hotel (essentially Marlene Krauss, since she is the one running the show), alleging that Marlene fired them without cause, and that she has failed to pay them the Incentive Fee that she owes them.
           In a March 14, 2008 letter, Marlene (through a lawyer) charged BD with “Default and Willful Misconduct.”  The “default” charge means they didn’t perform certain of their duties (for instance, perhaps, as we speculated in last Thursday’s post, they didn’t renovate rooms as they were supposed to); as for the “willful misconduct,” that, too may involve some of the problems we discussed on Thursday.  We will have to wait until we can get copies of the supporting documents in the case to know for sure what Marlene alleged.
            Anyway, Marlene used these charges to justify firing BD, and also for withholding BDs Incentive Fee, which BD claims (and they say Marlene agrees) is a whopping $2,717,285!  Marlene gave BD a month to leave the hotel, which means they should have been out by April 14, but they will apparently continue to manage the hotel (at least this is what they say) until the arbitration case is decided.

            The case is scheduled to be heard on Monday May 5, although, of course, a decision probably won’t be reached for awhile. 

            (The document also reveals BD’s astonishing claim to have increased net operating income of the hotel by 225%, revenue per available room by more than 35%, occupancy from 73% to 88%, and room nights sold by 41%.) — Ed Hamilton

Posted in

4 responses to “Arbitration Between BD and Chelsea 23rd St. Corp.”

  1.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Why do you find those stats so astonishing??

    Like

  2. easy target Avatar
    easy target

    In today’s NY Post, Marlene is quoted as saying she wants a management who is friendlier to the residents. My question to Marlene is how she can claim to seek that while also giving directives to remove residents by increasing rents beyond even the market value.
    Revenue has certainly been lost– I hope Marlene investigates the many tenants pushed out. If she needs help with the willful misconduct case against BD, she should seek out those who have been harassed.

    Like

  3. The Ghosts Avatar
    The Ghosts

    Friendlier to the residents? Why, that would be the Bards. Sounds like PR to me. After this debacle, who would want to mabnage it for Krauss and Elder, and add their names to the bad guy list?
    Seekout those who have been harassed? Since when has Marlene Krauss shown any interest in the Chelsea Hotel beyond the bottom line? hazs she spoken to any/all of the residents yet? She hasn’t a clue what to do with the Chelsea.
    And might I add, 2 million for increasing revenues? By my math, it’s a losing proposition all around for Krauss and Elder.

    Like

  4. LP Avatar
    LP

    Did anyone actually get the cheap rates for rooms? Everyone I’ve heard of asked for the cheap rate but had to take a higher priced room.
    There might be consumer affairs issue here. Did BD take their books with them? If not, we should impound them.

    Like

Leave a comment