On the first part of his most recent stay in New York, BBC Radio correspondent David Willis had the misfortune to check into one of those trendy boutique hotels.  About the experience he says:

Jbl-ipod-docking-station ”One of the effects of middle age is that things which once seemed funky and fun suddenly start to seem faintly ridiculous.”

Fleeing the ludicrous place with its “hipster-chic Alice in Wonderland décor” Willis was lucky enough to land a room at the Chelsea, and was immediately captivated:

“I took to wandering the corridors, marveling at the murals and the exotic smells emanating from the rooms.  I became enthralled by the building’s history and the larger-than-life cast of characters who once called the Chelsea home.”

Later, however, he talked to manager Andrew Tilley and was appalled to learn that the future of the Chelsea, “lies in flat screen televisions, in-house movies, mini-bars, and i-pod docking stations.”

Willis obviously gets it after only one brief stay here, so what's Tilley's problem? — Ed Hamilton

Posted in

47 responses to “An I-Pod Docking Station in Every Room”

  1.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Quite an impression Tilley is making on his fellow Brits. Seems they don’t care for his pompous patter on the other side of the pond, either.

    Like

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    This new fellow running the Chelsea could never have handled the hotel when blokes like Sid or Dee Dee Ramone were there. Just reading the posts here its plain that these people are threatened by simple free speech. Just think of how he’d soil his slacks their if something really went down on the premises. Mr. Tilley sounds out-leagued by the legacy of the property’s former management and rightfully so.

    Like

  3. Ashes to Ashes Avatar
    Ashes to Ashes

    Just what I need an I-Pod port.
    Of course without an I-Pod its called an ashtray.

    Like

  4.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Thats a cup holder with a remote, right?

    Like

  5. Old & Crabby Avatar
    Old & Crabby

    What about the ARTISTS? Thought Tilley wanted to put the artist’s work in the rooms and the promote the artists. You don’t hear him talking about that now do you!

    Like

  6. Big Bucks Baby Avatar
    Big Bucks Baby

    Now you can see why Tilley gets the big bucks around here. In addition to painting the elevators he’s an original thinker.

    Like

  7.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Tilley floats this ‘artists art in the guest rooms’ idea and dangles it in front of the self promoters of the Chelsea from whom he seeks acceptance, as if he can’t see the f’n hallways of the Chelsea are filled with residents art already just as they have always been. Its only those who wish to promote themselves to some advantage over of their fellow artists –a very un-bohemian behavior — who’d consider such a cockamamie plan masquerading as an original thought.

    Like

  8. colm o cuinneagain Avatar
    colm o cuinneagain

    whats next, a mc donalds in the chelsea?

    Like

  9. Steve-A-Reeno Avatar
    Steve-A-Reeno

    How about just a clean room to start with? I love that place and I travel often as a business traveler, I would gladly choose to “share the wealth” and somewhat subsidize the Chelsea, keep the hallways the same and let the people live within its walls as they wish they provide the vibe of the place and as such why I would stay there. Just make my 400/nite room as clean and apeealing as a Holiday Inn or Motel 6 and you have my business. It’s a great neighborhood to stay in while traveling and the right kind of repeat customers would find it– just make it meet minimum standards and we could have a good thing going. I feel bad for the full time tenants if the way they run the hotel tells on how the run the building.

    Like

  10.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    For a born BS artist like Andrew Tilley its always less about art or atmosphere than it is about entertainment and exploitation. He will certainly attempt to turn your beloved Chelsea into a version of the Hard Rock, one inane concept at a time. If he stays, its guaranteed you’ll have the “Joplin Suite” and the “Hendrix Suite”, and others, picking dry the bones that walked there in life. That’s Entertainment. And thats how he’ll get you; not all at once, but in increments.

    Like

  11.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    OK am hereby predicting a rash of UFO sightings over West 23rd Street the day after these babies get put in rooms. They look very aerodynamic

    Like

  12.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Won’t these just get stolen? C’mon Tilley

    Like

  13. Miss H Avatar
    Miss H

    The plans has always been to turn it into another banal, theme parkish hotel. There is only one Chelsea Hotel, there are dozens of trendy-today boutique hotels.

    Like

  14.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    El Quixote sits right downstairs, they have a full sized bar

    Like

  15. Where's the fun? Avatar
    Where’s the fun?

    I thought part of the reason NYC was a big destination for tourists was because there are a million things to do including going out to have a drink. What’s the point of checking into the Chelsea Hotel if all you plan to do is drink from the mini-bar, watch movies on a flat-screen tv and listen to your ipod. Stay home and save your money for the coming multi-year recession.

    Like

  16. Raincoat Type Avatar
    Raincoat Type

    ‘In-House Movies’ is code for porn, right?

    Like

  17. what this hotel needs is Avatar
    what this hotel needs is

    more exotic smells. no imported swells. down with tilley. bring back the bards.

    Like

  18.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Yes, indeed, in-house movies generally means Pay-Per-View skin flicks. That’s fancy hotel-speak acquired through years of hospitality training.
    Which only begs the question, does the ipod port respond well to K-Y lube?

    Like

  19.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    melodic fingerbowl

    Like

  20.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Drunken dwarves could easily mistake this for a ceramic toilet bowl. It all happens at the Chelsea.

    Like

  21.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Stanley used to tell every wide-eyed tourist they were getting “Dylan’s Suite” or “The room where Janis stayed with Leonard” In fact, I heard Jerry doing it just the other day.

    Like

  22.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Of course that implies that you know better than Bard and Jerry Weinstein. Tilley is taking applications at the desk — you can be the hotel’s historian

    Like

  23. I Walk L'Chaim Avatar
    I Walk L’Chaim

    What a presumptuous, rude comment about Jerry Weinstein. For your information, Dylan Thomas and Janis Jopin each occupied multiple dwellings in the Hotel Chelsea. Dylan took three tours of US colleges and stayed at the Chelsea each time. And no, not in the same room each time. And no, the rooms do not look as they did in 1953, they’ve been renovated and subdivided. Instead of criticizing Bard and Jerry who may has well have built the place with their bare hands, concentrate instead on improving your overblown fingerpainting or bad poetry.

    Like

  24. No Reservations Avatar
    No Reservations

    Anonymous – Spoken like somebody who probably tells everyone that THEY have “the room where Janis stayed with Leonard”. I’d take Jerry Weinstein’s version of Chelsea lore any day, thank you – his Chelsea Tour rocked!

    Like

  25.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    The Chelsea was never known for it’s technology, or its rooms’ ammenities. Still, I’d imagine that the music-loving visitors would like to have something on which to play music on. An old turntable might be a better fit, but most people travel with ipods (not vinyl) these days. I guess I don’t think a few ipod players would be all bad. Am I out of line?

    Like

  26. Miss H Avatar
    Miss H

    People who want to listen to music will probably bring their Ipods and their own docking stations.

    Like

  27. I am anonymous Avatar
    I am anonymous

    Like many Chelsea fans, I can take the good with the bad. I love what the hotel was and is and stands for, but unlike some of you guys, I’m not going to blindly look past all the questionable things that happened here. Stanley Bard deserves to be honored for making the Chelsea a home for creative and free thought, and for fostering so much good. But it’s wrong to look past the not-so-great things that he allowed to happen.
    In regards to the previous post. Sure, the Bards took in many a starving artist and gave them a chance. But many who were successful had their names and legacies pimped out to sell the hotel long after they left the hotel(and Jerry still does it!). Sure it’s not as bad as what the new owners are doing, but we can’t rewrite history the way we’d like it to be. The Chelsea was and is a place where wonderful things, weird things, and a few down-right awful things have and do happen. That’s what makes it so interesting to so many. When you guys (who are ANONYMOUS TOO by the way) poo-poo those of us who happen to remember it differently, you do the hotel, it’s current and former residents, and all their legacies a big disservice.
    Thanks for this blog, and please keep it a place for truth and open-mindedness.

    Like

  28. Anonymoose Avatar
    Anonymoose

    You’re not going to “blindly look past” what “questionable things”? We’re all ears. Have you dirt on Stanley Bard that nobody else has? Or merely another unwarranted dig at Jerry Weinstein, insinuating that he’s somehow disingenuous in his representation of the Hotel. I hear the bottom of the barrel scraping.

    Like

  29.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Whoa, now. You talk about former management like they actually did something to deserve the treatment they received. There are actual thieves running the Hotel now, and as a resident I’m not sure how that fact can be spun in new management’s favor.
    The Bards created something monumental, something admired across the entire world. What we’re talking about is preserving a tradition and bringing back the people who created this place that we all presumably love. They are the Soul of the Chelsea.
    Wish to see the tradition destroyed, as impostors like Marlene Krauss and those who blindly joined her little vendetta do? As with any business, leave that part to those who invested no part of themselves in its creation.

    Like

  30.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    If you can honestly take the good with the bad then you wouldn’t be parsing them. Each make up the Hotel’s folklore in equal parts.

    Like

  31. West Side Avatar
    West Side

    Does anyone know if Jerry Weinstein is still giving his Chelsea Tours, mentioned above? We want to sign up for one soon, before that becomes a thing of the past, too.

    Like

  32. I am anonymous Avatar
    I am anonymous

    Wow. With all the good will towards others on this blog, it’s a wonder more people don’t participate 🙂
    I care, and yes, I take the good with the bad but we have to be REASONABLE if we want to defeat the morons: I pay my rent, and I don’t mind those who are a month or two behind, but if you owe thousands of bucks this might not be the right place for you. I’m sober now, and I don’t mind bumping into a tipsy friend on the elevator or a little smoke wafting in the hallways, but nobody wants an active dealer with visitors at all hours nearby – especially the visitors looking for a certain thing. I like to keep my space clean and functional, and I’m no neat freak, but I’d like to have safe elevators and a odor-free trash cans. I don’t think you wouldn’t prefer working elevators and reliable heat and hot water — well I would too. And about the above “anonymous” statement: I really enjoy being in a place with so much history, but it makes my skin crawl to hear anyone (Bards included) pimp out the hotel and great artists’ legacies – list to that awful goop on the hold machine. I miss the vibe that existed before the others took over. Call me an idealist, but in this new era of hope, can we all try to find a way out of this mess with a positive attitude please? Maybe someday we can stop being anonymous and talk friend to friend.
    I know, I know, I’m probably in the minority, so cue the “real bohemians’ outrage”… but Ed please don’t censor me, I’m about to give up on this blog.

    Like

  33. Lush Avatar
    Lush

    Ex Lush
    “You don’t mind” when your neighbors get a little behind on their rent? Is that comment for real?
    What would that even have to do with you? Why would it even be your business unless you tried to somehow make it your business? I, for one, have no idea what the rent-paid status of my neighbors is but do know enough to realize its none of my concern.
    Who are you to suggest what place is right for anybody based on their income? You have issues bigger than threats of “giving up on the blog”.

    Like

  34. Against All Odds Avatar
    Against All Odds

    the Bards did not ‘pimp’ the Chelsea as it has been so eloquently put. they BUILT the Chelsea. without them we have nothing to talk about except a building that would likely have gone under the wrecking ball decades ago. amazed at how some want to make their little point against all odds.

    Like

  35.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    JERRY WEINSTEIN HAS NEVER BEEN A PIMP OF THE HOTEL CHELSEA HE BRINGS LIGHT AND LAUGHTER AND A BROAD HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE TO THE PLACE WITH HIS CHARMING PERSONALITY

    Like

  36.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    the blog would be nothing without you, anonymous one. thank you. thank you. thank you.

    Like

  37.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    IAA – your passive-aggressiveness is why you sense your being criticized. Its pretty thick

    Like

  38.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    What stinking garbage? What visitors roaming the halls looking for drugs?

    Like

  39. I Am AnonyMess Avatar
    I Am AnonyMess

    Some commenters are ‘Anonymous’ because they obviously oppose new management’s hostile takeover and do not want to become targets, as other residents have become targets. This should go without saying.
    But someone who opposes the Bards and still visits the Living With Legends blog should have no such reservations since, after all, YOUR side is in control of the situation.

    Like

  40.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    The “good will towards others” comment…I’m confused.
    Does that mean no one is supposed to disagree?

    Like

  41. A tourist Avatar
    A tourist

    I wish my $900 or more after a recent stay would have helped with keeping the nasty notes from flying under doors just a week after I visited in October. I’m a tourist. I don’t pretend to be anything else. But I revel in the Chelsea and the way it recharges my batteries. Hope things come to some resolution. I hope the next time I need to drop a grand in NY I’ll find the Chelsea in its timeless, podless funk, waiting for me no matter whose former room I’m told I’m in…although wearing stilettos makes the elevator thing a real hassle…other than that, no complaints. Keep the faith, tenants.

    Like

  42. Chelseaite Avatar
    Chelseaite

    A Tourist – We hope so too! Come back soon ~
    Hopefully you’ll never have the pleasure, but here at the Chelsea our so-called Manager “Mr. Tilley” doesn’t put the nasty notices under doors or in private mailboxes behind the desk. Rahther, Mr. Tilley uses yards of tape to paste them as conspicuously as possible ON your door for any and all passers-by to eavesdrop on. He’s strictly a class act.

    Like

  43.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    your 900 buck will go toward purchasing this lovely junk from i pod

    Like

  44. Flight Pattern Avatar
    Flight Pattern

    …the future of the Chelsea, “lies in flat screen televisions, in-house movies, mini-bars, and i-pod docking stations.”
    OKAY I REALIZE THE CHELSEA IS STUCK IN THE PAST AND HAPPILY SO BUT SERIOUSLY…ITS 2008..I CAN GET THESE AMENETIES AT PRACTICALLY ANY HOTEL. NEXT!!!

    Like

  45. Miss H Avatar
    Miss H

    The Chelsea isn’t stuck in the past. It exists oustide your conception of time and space. It’s in its own dimension.

    Like

  46. jetlag Avatar
    jetlag

    i also travel a lot and can find flatscreens and ports almost anyplace thats worth paying money to sleep in. as for pay-per-view and minibars they’ve been standard issue in most hotels since the 1970s. i’m not talking mo-tels. these new ‘amenities’ would not lure me to the chelsea over another hotel so its a dumb idea altogether in a cash strapped economy. i would come to the chelsea simply because its the chelsea.

    Like

  47. Just Desserts Avatar
    Just Desserts

    OK so its been confirmed now that Andrew Tilley is telling employees of the Hotel that the reason for his installation of yet more spy cameras in the building is that at least “three flat screen tvs have been stolen from rooms”.
    Apparently, the criminal masterminds behind these alleged thefts was so stealthy that he or she were able to ferry these tvs out of the building without being seen by the cameras placed by each elevator, IN each elevator, and the many (now working) cameras in the lobby area. Sound like more BS from ‘No Willy’ Andrew Tilley.
    If it wasn’t BS, there would be reports in the Police Blotter regarding the thefts – which are grand larceny in NY, unless these flatscreens were display models with dents and scratches they are going to have value. So Tilley hasn’t reported these alleged grand larcenies to the cops? Why not?
    Secondly, if it is true that flatscreens have indeed been stolen by guests, then that proves the point that its a stupid idea to spend resources on flatscreens and iPod ports that will just be lifted or destroyed by transients. Didn’t Tilley consider mounting the TVs to the wall? Or how about getting some ID and a credit card from the guests who supposedly nabbed them.
    I’m everyone can see how many holes exist in Tilley’s story. The spy cams are for one thing – spying.
    And nobody is making off with flatscreens without being spotted themselves.
    STOP LYING TO THE STAFF, ANDREW

    Like

Leave a comment