The breaking news at New York’s famed Chelsea Hotel is that managing partner Stanley Bard, and the rest of the Bard family, have been forced out by their board of directors. Starting Monday, an as yet unnamed new management company will take over the day-to-day operations of the hotel. The beloved Stanley—everyone calls him by his first name—has been in charge of the hotel for over fifty years.
     It was he who fashioned and maintained the unique creative dynamic of the hotel, presiding over the sixties when Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen wrote some of their greatest songs here, and Andy Warhol filmed the famHotelous Chelsea Girls. Since then, nearly everyone who’s anyone in the New York art, music and writing scene has lived here at sometime or another, including Patti Smith and Robert Mapplethorpe, Madonna, Dee Dee Ramone, and more recently Ethan Hawke and Ryan Adams. Stanley has always managed to keep rents low for the creative people living here, most of whom—unlike the stars listed—don’t have much money, but all of whom are just as important in maintaining the famous Chelsea spirit.
     Certainly we’re all a bit apprehensive here at the hotel, wondering what will happen now to our unique artistic community. The actual ownership structure of the hotel is a closely guarded secret. It is known that Stanley’s father, David, in partnership with two men named Krauss and Gross, bought the hotel in 1940. (Stanley took over upon his father’s death in 1957.) These days, the part of the hotel that Stanley’s father owned is still in the Bard family, but the interests of the other partners’ families are represented by a board of directors. The board seems to have given Stanley a wide latitude in managing the hotel over the years–that is, apparently, until just recently. What happened is that the hotel simply became too valuable.      
     When Chelsea was a depressed neighborhood it was one thing, but now that this area is one of the most desirable in New York, the temptation to cash in has apparently proved too compelling to ignore. The other owners—outsiders who have no stake in the Chelsea–would just as soon turn the building into a boutique hotel and rent the rooms to rich tourists, or gut the building and convert it to condos. Lately, the board had been pressing Stanley relentlessly to make more money, and in the past few years he made a series of missteps, raising rents on many tenants—perhaps illegally–initiating a flurry of lawsuits.
     Despite some ruffled feathers and bad feelings, however, few of us here doubt that Stanley has always had our best interests, and those of our unique community, at heart. On the other hand, many of us suspect that this is what gave the board the pretext for the take-over. Stanley, who was seen staggering out of his office Thursday evening in disbelief after being given the news, was ousted just days before his 73rd Birthday on June 16. He had planned to turn over the reins of the hotel to his son, David, who has worked alongside him for many years. Please write in to this blog to show your support for the Bard family and the Chelsea artistic community. — Ed Hamilton  (Photo: Chelsea Now)

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

sparkle hayter

It’s a crime against humanity.

Posted by sparkle hayter on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 5:33 PM
[

Countess Cherry Ramone

we’re devestated

Posted by Countess Cherry Ramone on Sunday, June 17, 2007 at 12:37 AM

This is easily the most digusting news i’ve heard in a long time….I LOVE Stanley and The Chelsea willNOT be The Chelsea without him………………..Happy Birthday, Happy Fathers’ Day and Happy Trails is BS!!!!!!!!!!!! WE LOVE YOU STANLEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (It seems "the spirit of Robert Moses" will kill NYC yet – very sad!)

Posted by anno on Sunday, June 17, 2007 at 1:31 PM

what a bumer he was allways so good to me the 10 years i was there if you see him send my love
JON B BERGER

i stayed in the chelsea when i was 21 ands was the best most important time of my life, until i had to move back to scotland, outraged at what us happening to it.
i wrote ma best songs and tales in this place, well i think idid lyrical y,s anyhow.

grand indeed

hope the fight continues
iwas planning and coming back for a visit and stay to this year.

craigy

Posted in

43 responses to “Board-Directed Coup Topples Chelsea Hotel’s Famed Manager Stanley Bard”

  1. casebeer & joe myers Avatar
    casebeer & joe myers

    Ouch, ouch, ouch.

    Like

  2. Dan McKeaney Avatar

    I’ve only stayed at the Hotel once, but it was a desire I’d cultivated since I was 15 (I’m 28 now) and I first heard “Chelsea Hotel #2”. I brought my girlfriend there last year for our anniversary and staying there was one of the greatest times of both our lives. This news makes me want to cry. Though I live in Los Angeles, if they try anything, we all must band together and do whatever possible to stop it.

    Like

  3. Former Resident Avatar
    Former Resident

    I certainly don’t think people should lay down and take it. It’s the Chelsea, there should be a creative, nonviolent, witty protest. Regret should haunt the greedy ones’ every step in that place. Every luminary who every created there should get together with Stanley to buy out the place. And if by some chance these efforts fail, and the Chelsea does succumb to this Sickness the boad of directors has, these peop,ke who value mammon over art and soul, it should go out with a bang not a whimper.
    This is worth repeating:
    The Hotel Chelsea
    Edgar Lee Masters
    Anita! Soon this Chelsea Hotel
    Will vanish before the city’s merchant greed,
    Wreckers will wreck it, and in its stead
    More lofty walls will swell
    This old street’s populace. Then who will know
    About its ancient grandeur, marble stairs,
    Its paintings, onyx-mantels, courts, the heirs
    Of a time now long ago?
    Who will then know that Mark Twain used to stroll
    In the gorgeous dining-room, that princesses,
    Poets and celebrated actresses
    Lived here and made its soul;
    In after years, so often made and unmade
    By the changing generations, until today
    It stands a tomb of happiness passed away,
    Of an era long overlaid?
    Floor What loves were lived here, what despairs endured,
    What children born here, and what mourners went
    Out of its doors, what peace and what lament
    These rooms knew, long obscured
    Will be more lost when fifty years from hence
    The place thereof will have no memory,
    When men must hunt its picture, so to see
    What it looked like amid this turbulence!
    Few now remember even the noted names
    That loved its hospitality in past years.
    Who will remember me when wrecking shears
    Clip like a leaf this room of troubled aims,
    And make this window one with the sky’s space,
    By which I sat looking into the court?
    This table that I write on will not report
    My dreams, gone by without a trace.
    There will not be a seat for any ghost,
    No room left for a musing ghost to smile
    On kisses, vows, regrets, that for a while
    Made life, and then were lost.
    The blue-eyed woman who went out and in
    The entrance door, time and the tooth thereof
    Will take her, take the man who gave her love,
    Both will be lost ere twenty years begin.
    With purest love this woman was beloved;
    With pain her lover looked upon her grief,
    Her past, and strove to give her heart relief,
    Himself by Life so moved.
    All this will be but currents of the air
    Veering and lost. Tell me how souls can be
    Such flames of suffering and of ecstasy,
    Then fare as the winds fare?
    Tell me how love that fills the human heart
    With a sense of things eternal must submit
    To what is eyeless, and is infinite,
    And hears so soon the word ‘depart/”
    Anita! You can perpetuate by thought
    What we have lived, when this hotel is gone.
    Passing its site remember I was one
    Who sought for peace and found it not.
    Remember that I loved you, scarce could bear
    My helplessness to give your spirit thrift –
    Remember this as with the tide you drift,
    Others will not remember, nor even care.

    Like

  4. Betty Bishop Avatar

    What can we do? I live in Toronto, Canada and I would love to buy a week a year at the Chelsea if I could afford it. How many others are there like me? Someone should arrange a sort of Town Hall meeting of all interested – hell that isn’t really necessary now that we have the internet! I will be watching this site but I actually wish I was sitting in the lobby!

    Like

  5. Sarah Avatar
    Sarah

    So glad that I met you on the firescape…I knew that it was for a reason. The news is not only shocking…but sad and scary all at the same time. We need to unite. You need to unite us through your blog. Can u please do that?

    Like

  6. Becky Avatar

    This is so very wrong. Just totally and utterly wrong. I wish I lived closer so I might be able to take part in any sort of active protest there may be, but whatever I can do from SC, I’ll do it in a heartbeat.

    Like

  7. Randi Marx Avatar

    I’m just shocked beyond belief. Last time I was at the hotel I heard these rumors of change, but I kept thinking no one would really do something so drastic. I heard they were thinking of raising rent, raising prices of hotel rooms for guests, maybe condos–but not once did someone mention that Stanley wouldn’t manage the beautiful Hotel Chelsea.
    It scares me to think what might be ahead. I just don’t have a lot of faith in business types that have no heart in the matter. It’s impossible to imagine the front desk without Stanley there or near-by.
    Thanks for keeping us all posted, btw. I’ll definitely be watching the blog closely for any updates.

    Like

  8. Carrie Bedsore /Cherry Ramone / Rob from Aus Avatar
    Carrie Bedsore /Cherry Ramone / Rob from Aus

    The ghosts won’t welcome new inhabitants.

    Like

  9. sparkle Avatar
    sparkle

    What they did to Stanley and David is just so wrong on so many levels.

    Like

  10. Larry Avatar

    I landed in Chelsea after ending a 14-year relationship in August of 2004. My head was spinning, and after a month of sleeping in my office and hooking up randomly when I wanted to sleep in a bed, I walked in to the Chelsea and spoke to Stanley. I described my situation and he said “I have exactly what you need.” It was a hot-pink room with a window facing an air shaft. It was quiet, and comforting — a womb, really. I was finally able to get some sleep and figure out how to reorganize my life. I was a total stranger, and Stanley did this for me. Yes, the front desk lost my absentee New Jersey ballot and I had to get a court order to be able to vote against Bush, and yes, Stanley wouldn’t let me leave when I wanted to, forcing me to stay (and pay) for an extra few days, but I’ll always be grateful for the way he thoughtfully took me in.
    Aside from all that, the loss of the Chelsea as we know it is the symbolic end of the neighborhood we love.
    Maybe this is why “Chelsea” has not been illuminated on the sign lately.

    Like

  11. Brian F. Avatar
    Brian F.

    If they even THINK about turning that place into condo’s… there will be hell to pay.
    Yeah– they can consider that a threat. Bastards!

    Like

  12. topher Avatar
    topher

    It’s gone. bye bye. a tragedy. any idea who the other partners are and what sorts of things they’ve done in the past?

    Like

  13. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    Man, un-f’ing-believable!… Stayed at the Chelsea just last week, for the week… It had always been a wish to stay there, and finally had the chance… Stanley checked me in on Monday (“Here, you want today’s Post?”), and he started each day with “good morning” and ended it with “good night” as I passed by… The only time he wasn’t there was when I checked out Friday morning, and now I know why… This is really-really-really scary…

    Like

  14. mj Avatar
    mj

    I don’t think anyone will like my following commentary, but I want to preface it by saying that I lived in the Chelsea from 1997-1998, and very much enjoyed my time there. Stanley’s son David is close to my age, and we would chat occasionaly. I liked Stanley, David, and his sister very much – they are lovely people.
    Having said that, the sense of entitlement I heard from residents who were living at the Chelsea long term when I was there, as well as those living there now, is egregious. Nobody owes YOU anything! It isn’t a welfare business being run so that you can live your (ahem) “outsider” artiste lifestyles however you wish. You’re all adults, and you’re accountable for your own lives. The other Board members (whom I do not know) are certainly within their rights to wish to maximize their financials – their families invested their money long ago, and have been giving many of you long term Chelsea Hotel residents a well-below-market-ride for, in some case, decades. So now the gravy train has stopped – boo-hoo-hoo. Now you’ll have to be responsible, mature adults, and not daydream or work part time gigs while you chill in the Chelsea, but you’ll actually have to start working full time like all the other hard working members of society do and pull your own weight! Be VERY thankful for the wonderful opportunity you’ve had – now wake up and smell the coffee. Nobody owes you anything – you have to earn it on your own merits and by your own hard work, day after day for the rest of your lives.
    I do wish Stanley, David, and the rest of the family the very best. It’s not nice the way this was handled, but, as the saying goes, that’s why it’s called ‘show business’ and not ‘show friends.’

    Like

  15. Former Resident Avatar
    Former Resident

    MJ, I think you miss the point, and missed a few other things during your relatively brief time at the Chelsea.
    It was not a free ride. People paid to live there, real money, and people there worked very hard, day in day out, often at a job as well as as their art. And residents put up with things that people paying “market” prices would not have put up with. But you see, the Chelsea was a place where you were buffered a little bit from those savage market forces, and where you found community with other creative people, and where people could be free and real without a lot of the conformist bullshit of middle america or wall street or any other powerful political clique. This is why so many great artists worked here. The bottom line isn’t the only thing that matters my cynical friend. All worthwhile art is not commercial. I sense you’re the type of guy/gal who would tell Van Gogh to quit whining and get a real job, who would say the same to Jesus after kicking him down the stairs.
    Have people lost sight of what truly matters in this world? Does everything have to be egared towards maximizing profit?

    Like

  16. resident2 Avatar
    resident2

    I have lived at the Chelsea since 98. I have no idea who ‘mj’ is, but I have no problem recognizing that he/she is a particularly idiotic and embittered specimen of a certain type, i.e., someone who for personal psychological reasons fetishizes market forces as an agency of moral good, and who simply cannot grasp that there might be more to life–and to New York–than devoting oneself to financial profit. A question for mj: what do you do with yourself at the end of the day, after your daily dose of virtuous labor? You might hang out with friends, family, sure–but you might also read a book, or listen to music, or go see a movie, or ponder artwork, or go shopping for interesting fashion. Put it another way: why is it, when we’re ill, that we see doctors? So that we can get better in order to make more money? Or so that we may take pleasure from life? And who do you think provides society with its sources of non-material pleasure? Let me enlighten you: creative types. So enough of this rubbish about freeloaders who fail to contribute to society: a society without such ‘freeloaders’ is not a society worth having. And what enables creative types to function–to do the very demanding, difficult of making valuable things out of nothing? A creative, enabling environment. Do we have a surfeit of such environments in New York? No: hence the unique value of the Chelsea.
    Also, as these threads reveal, the Chelsea does much more than serve its residents: it serves as a living, authentic symbol of a life informed by art and non-conformity. If you, mj, had less of a chip on your shoulder and less of that creepy Schadenfreude, you might be able grasp that simple fact.

    Like

  17. Former Resident Avatar
    Former Resident

    Resident2, hear hear! And you nailed it, “creepy schadenfreude.” It’s an epidemic these days.

    Like

  18. Robin Avatar
    Robin

    Gosh,such dismay. Can’t she be Land-Marked? What can we do to help?
    By the by, Mark, that’s a fine bit of vitriol you have going there. Yipes. Where ever did you find the time?

    Like

  19. Gary Avatar
    Gary

    I second that, Former Resident. I can not stand the new smugness that permeates so many about the active removal of people in the name of profit only. It’s Idol/Idle worship and will be the death bell for this city’s cultural heart if they are allowed to get away with it.
    So sorry to find out about this David and Stanley. I am so sorry.

    Like

  20. Daily Intelligencer - New York Magazine Avatar

    Stanley Bard Ousted From Chelsea Hotel

    The legendary Chelsea Hotel has seen all kinds of unpleasantness over the course of its history, but ne…

    Like

  21. Sherill Avatar
    Sherill

    The Chelsea Hotel is already landmarked and can’t be torn down, nor can its exterior appearance be changed. The interior is another story.
    Without the enforcement of lower rents there will be no art in New York City, aside from packaged, marketed fake-“art” like this, taken from Motoko Rich’s article on the NYC Architecture website,linked by the Chelsea Blog:
    “IZAK SENBAHAR, a developer of luxury condominiums in Manhattan, was commenting this week that neighbors should not complain about a glass tower overlooking the Hudson River that he is planning. It is being designed by Richard Meier for a site just south of the two Perry Street buildings the architect also created.
    “Simply by the fact that a new building by Richard Meier is being sold there, values will go up,” Mr. Senbahar said. “Do you want to have a printer next to you or another high-class pure Richard Meier building next door?”
    Before he could continue, he was interrupted by Louise Sunshine, one of New York City’s most aggressive promoters of high-end real estate. “No, don’t say ‘high class,’ ” she said. “Say ‘work of art.’ ”
    In the latest marketing ploy for high-priced condos, Ms. Sunshine is trying to give real estate the cachet of fine paintings or sculpture. She plans to market the 31 apartments in the new Meier building, which broke ground in December, as “limited edition” residences. To underscore the point, Mr. Meier has commissioned clear acrylic models of the apartments — which he will sign and number to give buyers as a closing gift. “

    Like

  22. JZ Avatar
    JZ

    The real landmark is not just the building and the exterior appearance. The landmark of value is so much more and it includes the history, inhabitants and “management”. Stanley’s management and navigation should be landmarked. American culture would likely be poorer were it not for the Chelsea … and by “the Chelsea”, I mean the Chelsea Hotel that Stanley made possible…. and to top it off, it was still vital.

    Like

  23. Victoria Avatar
    Victoria

    Stanley is the Chelsea!

    Like

  24. Don Avatar
    Don

    I know politicians are shmucks….can’t we write or call someone?

    Like

  25. rwells Avatar

    seems to me that one solution would be for anyone rich and famous (or middle class and obscure, or broke and infamous, etc.,) who has claimed the Chelsea as part of their development should get together and make an offer on the place.

    Like

  26. sparkle Avatar
    sparkle

    I’d like to think we could heal this with love, but a management company sounds awfully robotic, and these investors who did this are too mysterious to reach out to. I wonder, what have they ever done for the Chelsea Hotel? Evidently, they are heirs, and have some legal authority by virtue of their lucky births. But they have no moral authority. Stanley was the one who ran the place, who did the work, who took care of the legendary people that made it world-famous, enabling their masterpieces and lesser works, who put in long days, endured the headaches and frustrations, who dealt with the crises, small and large, who came to our readings, our exhibits, our concerts, our plays, our premieres, our weddings, our wakes. He’s the one, along with the residents, who built the reputation, created the history the new management will milk to attract guests/buyers. What did they do, other than split the profits? Maybe they did do something, and someone will post it here and enlighten me.
    It’s not like Stanley was an ever-indulgent uncle. He’d let people ride on the rent for a while because he understood the ebb and flow of artists’ earnings and moods, but if things didn’t pick up sooner or later he’d ask you to pack your bags because he did pay attentiont ot he business side too. Of course, he’d also go to extravagant lengths to make sure the departing resident had another, safe place to go to.
    These investors do nothing, let him and hundreds of artists and others create this magnificent legend, and then swoop down and steal it out from under him and everyone who lives there?
    It’s wrong.

    Like

  27. Sheila Alberti Avatar
    Sheila Alberti

    I am so sorry to hear this. Stanley, you RULE! You will always RULE!
    The Hotel Chelsea is Stanley’s baby. He raised the level of compassion for poor artists
    in this city, when, as the years went on, others abandoned them.
    The Hotel Chelsea, I hope it’s uniqueness and creative spirit and the amazing ghosts who reside
    there will not also be ousted by the new management. Fact is, NO ONE can replace Stanley Bard and his big heart,
    and anyone or organization that does, has some awfully big shoes to fill and will forever be resented for their actions.
    Love to you Stanley!
    Sheila

    Like

  28. AP Avatar
    AP

    What about making the board an offer they can’t refuse, you think they might sell it for 100 million dollars?
    If everyone puts in $10, then we need 1,000,000 people to raise the money.
    If everyone put in $100, then we need 100,000 people
    If everyone put in $1000, then we need 10,000 people
    We buy the property back and this way it continues to be managed by Stanley and co-owned by shareholders. By exploiting our press contacts and the support of residents and Chelsea lovers everywhere, it can be done.
    And not only that, saving the Chelsea can set an example: the money hungering can be defeated by passion and clever strategies.

    Like

  29. dieselcle Avatar
    dieselcle

    Are you people nuts?
    This place is worth millions.
    How long did you expect the “free ride” to last?

    Like

  30. Former Resident Avatar
    Former Resident

    Dieselcle, I’m sorry, but that’s an idiotic statement, and very ignorant of the Chelsea Hotel.
    Free ride?
    The people getting the free ride out of the Chelsea were the investors who inherited their stake and never did a damned thing to help the residents or Stanley or build the reputation of the Chelsea Hotel. Has nobody noticed this? No, the people being denigrated are the poor artists, while the rich heirs are considered well within their rights.
    The ride was never free or the residents, not financially. People paid rent, a lot of rent in most cases, to live there. The hotel did provide a great deal of creative and personal freedom for artists, and a flexible payment policy that took into account the often untimely receipt of artist monies. But the ride was never free. People there worked hard and made sacrifices.
    But you, I fear, are typical of the New New Yorker — here to grab some cash, or you’re an heir/heiress who already has a lot of cash and you’re here enjoying your free ride in a city that is rapidly turning into a rich people’s theme park. New York is all about money to too many people in the city.
    It’s a shame, a crime against the humanity of New York.

    Like

  31. Former Resident Avatar
    Former Resident

    AP, I’m in for a grand and I agree, let’s defeat this. This is Art vs. Moneygrubbing Commerce now. It’s a fight worth fighting.

    Like

  32. 421to323 Avatar
    421to323

    Gothamist echoes a suggestion on this blog:
    http://gothamist.com/2007/06/19/chelsea.php
    Flood the hotel with homemade postards (or other art). Send the same to the management company and, if we can get proper addresses to the bord of directors.
    The first one should be sent to
    Stanley Bard
    The Chelsea Hotel
    222 west 23rd street
    nyc ny 10011

    Like

  33. K.H. Avatar

    Is there a petition yet in paper form to sign to help save it?
    Being a “poor artist in Canada” who hasn’t made it to New York yet, I have never had the chance to stay there, But having seen it through the eyes of some of my favourite artists/writers, I dream about seeing the rooms.

    Like

  34. Ali Avatar
    Ali

    So sorry about this – v bad news. I’ve wanted to stay at the Chelsea for years, but haven’t yet got over to NY from the UK. I’m in for $100 – it’s a crime against culture to make the Bards leave and commercialise the Chelsea.

    Like

  35. georgia Avatar
    georgia

    the years Max and i (and our two sons when they were home) spent at the Chelsea were our happiest in New York. there isn’t a day i don’t miss that wonderful place, and it was wonderful merely because of it’s physical grace, but because of the grace of the family that ran it. the Bard family will always have a special place in our hearts – Stanley is a true one of a kind marvelous soul.

    Like

  36. casebeer & joe myers Avatar
    casebeer & joe myers

    How on earth “MJ” landed in the Chelsea with his starchy, bottom line sensibilities is beyond me. I vote that he be stricken from the HC record and barred from ever telling anyone he lived there. He so didn’t get it.
    If it wasn’t for Stanley’s inventive approach to renting to artists, HC would have died a junkies death and been condemned long before some of these lucky heirs were ever born. It is precisely because of Stanley (“the world’s most famous landlord”, by his own account and so many others) and the artists and residents that make/have made the hotel so famous that the Chelsea is still here to be argued over.
    We lived at the Chelsea in 2000 & 2001, with our two children. Our studio apartment cost $3000 a month. Hardly a “free ride”. However, Stanley did let us in without so much as our bank account number or full names. It was so human. And, yes we paid the desk irregularly, but we paid it. When we did come up short, Stanley let us out of our lease to move the kids away from the heartbreak after September 11, and sold a painting of mine in the stairwell to one of residents for several thousand dollars to make up the difference. “You’ll get some rest, you’ll make some art, you’ll come back to us.” This kindness, especially during that difficult time, was extraordinary. It may not be how they do it on Wall Steet, but it works. It’s called ‘human decency’, MJ. Try it out sometime, you just might like it.
    The Chelsea is one of the last great things in NY. What is happening to it is heartbreaking on a much larger scale. I have to end this now, as the MJ’s and Boards of Directors of the world are causing my suicidal tendancies to flare.
    Love to the Chelsea and to Stanley and David. Our time there was one of the richest things in this world. Viva la Chelsea!

    Like

  37. A witness Avatar
    A witness

    I’m in for $1,000.
    Originally, the Chelsea was created and owned by a mix of wealthy builders and architects, artists-with-money, and well-off families whose children wanted to be study art, music or acting in NYC. They occupied 2/3 of the building, and the rest was rented to people (mostly artists) with less money. Why not try it again? It’s better than the current situation.

    Like

  38. charle Avatar
    charle

    WHAT SHOULD BE DONE PERHAPS IS FOR SOMEONE TO DOCUMENT THE HOTEL AS IT IS NOW.THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL FOR THIS BUILDING.WHEN BIG MONEY MOVES IN THEY USUALLY CRUSH PEOPLE LIKE THEY ARE ANTS.THE SAD THING IS THAT TRUE ART ARISES OUT OF REAL SUBSTANCE FROM THE HUMAN HEART AND SPIRIT.MONEY CAN NOT CREATE ART,BUT IT GOES ALONG WAY IN GREEDILY TRYING TO POSESS IT.THINK ABOUT WHEN THIS CONVERSION IS DONE BE IT HOTEL OR CONDO.WHAT YOU WILL HAVE IS ALOT OF VERY BORED RICH WANDERING IN AND OUT ,NOT REALLY KNOWING WHY THEY ARE THERE OR WHAT TO DO NEXT.THEY WILL COME AND GO JUST LIKE THE GHOSTS FROM THE PAST,NO SUBSTANCE REMAINS.REMEMBER VANITY OH VANITY,ALL IS VANITY.BUT KNOW THAT ONE DAY TOO THIS GRAND SCHEME WILL BE A THING OF THE PAST FOR THEM TOO!LIFE MOVES ON,GO WITH IT.

    Like

  39. Romy Ashby Avatar

    What a heartbreak. I spent so many wonderful evenings with Vali Myers in her room in the early 1990s. She always appreciated Stanley and made it known. He helped her out more than once when she was having a tough time with the rent. It’s so sad to witness he huge shift in general values that seems to be crushing everything in its wake. In the movie Ruth Cullen made about Vali called The Tightrope Dancer, there’s a little scene where she’s come back to New York from Italy and she’s on the phone with someone who’s just asked her where she’s staying, and she says, “At the Chelsea, Love, where else?” I wonder what she’d have to say if she were still with us.

    Like

  40. yuki Avatar
    yuki

    It’s insane.

    Like

  41. Maggie Black Avatar

    I am Scottish,amd stayed in the Chelsea for a shot while, loved the bohemian atmosphere and the laissez-faire attitude – paintings all up the stairs and slong the corridors – people praactising arias in the lobby.

    Like

  42. Razzle D. Azzle #5,6,7,8 (Angel City Derby Girls) Avatar

    When I was in NY this past January I walked my friend Meredith into the lobby and Stanley was at the front desk. We inquired about the room rates both monthly and weekly and Stanley was awesome — brimming with stories that painted vibrant pictures of New York culture and history. We were strangers, but he was so willing to share his passion for the hotel with us. I will never forget that moment in time. I am friends with Nina Hagen for the past 22 years and Stanley remembered Nina and the years she lived at the Chelsea. I also knew Shitzo and Umberto who lived at the Chelsea many years. I am distressed that this society has such little regard for anything but greed. It sickens me. It is almost like a jealous reaction to those who can think beyond the norm; those who chose a less than conventional way of life in order to create art beyond the imagination of the average mind. These artists struggle and these artists need to congregate with other artists to further their growth. If there is no place left in New York City where artists can have affordable housing in a community of like-minded artists, I fear the less than gifted greed-mongers will wipe everything that made New York so unique, off the map altogether. They vibe will be plastic and contrived via the minds of developers rather than grass-roots artists. Prefab art will take over the City and there will no longer be anything special about New York other than its past history. New York needs more than history to stay afloat as the mecca for artisit. It needs affordable housing for artists — no crack whore flop houses, rather artists communities like the Chelsea. Non-creative people; non romantic people; mundane people will have a hard time valuing gems like the Hotel Chelsea. They will distroy the heart of New York City as a result.
    I love Broadway and what is left of the New York Arts. Please open your hearts and look beyond your normal line of thinking when it comes to rare havens like the Hotel Chelsea.

    Like

Leave a comment